« Reform Party Budget Forum | HomePage | Singapore Election: On your marks, get set... »
02/03/2009
The Rape of Singapore
From Getting at the Truth

Uncle Sam - "Pay up or else!"
As we correctly predicted, the U.S. is beginning to call in its markers.
If you read the fine print on the U.S. conversion of its Citigroup debt to ordinary shares in the company, you could have predicted it too.
Here’s the fine print:
The U.S. said it will convert its stake in Citigroup to the extent that Citigroup can persuade private investors, including several big foreign government investment funds, to do so.
The U.S. Treasury Department will match the private investors’ conversions dollar-for-dollar.
The arms have been twisted successfully, and the U.S. will convert 25 billion dollars of capital into Citigroup ordinary shares.
So whose arm got twisted?
We don’t know all of the victims, but Singapore’s GIC was, most likely, the largest.
Singapore will convert its preferred notes, which yielded 7%, to ordinary shares. Singapore will do this at a price of $3.25 a share below the conversion price of $26.35 as agreed when it invested in the preference notes.
This means Singapore is paying $3.25 a share for Citigroup, and giving up their 7% yield of $482 million a year for no yield at all!
Friday, on the NYSE, Citigroup plunged to $1.50 a share.
Let’s do the math. Singapore is paying $3.25 a share for shares worth $1.50. Singapore is paying doubles (2.17 times to be exact) the going price for Citigroup shares.
That dilutes Singapore’s initial investment in Citigroup for the original $6.88 billion to $3.17 billion - a loss for Singapore of $3.71 billion.
Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore’s de facto ruler, has said that Citibank has an excellent franchise, and that Singapore has invested for the long term - 20 or 30 years - far beyond his life expectancy.
17:04 Posted by soci | Permalink | Comments (2) | Trackbacks (0) | Email this | Tags: citigroup, singapore
Trackbacks
The URL to Trackback this post is: http://singabloodypore.rsfblog.org/trackback/1634938
Comments
If you invest in a firm and it goes broke, you lose your investment. That GIC has a single cent of equity left in Citi is only the product of government intervention (at American taxpayers expense). Eventually the GIC investment in Citi will be worth zero, as the firm will be absorbed by the state, chopped up and sold. Holders of equity etc will get wiped out.
Posted by: Mises | 03/03/2009
The credit crisis was caused by govt intervention: inflation of the money supply, CRA (credit reinvestment act — lending money to bad risks), corruption and collusion etc etc.
The US Federal government is the most invasive, cross-border interventionist in history (supposedly 'guarding' freedom, liberty and 'democracy'). George W expanded the influence, and now President Hussein takes it to the next level.
Now the S'pore govt gets nailed by govt intervention, that's so sweet man — I can't help but laugh my nuts off.
Posted by: Matilah_Singapura | 03/03/2009
Post a comment
NB: Comments are moderated on this weblog.




